Likewise, the single wing requires a superstar fullback who can essentially “do it all”. Plenty of high schools still run the single wing, but it is often regarded as a gimmicky offense that relies on a defense’s inability to prepare. However, at the higher levels of football, nearly all hints of the single wing disappeared for many years.
The La Center High School Wildcats in Washington used a single wing derivative offense in the late ‘90s, which essentially began the tradition of “Wildcat” offensive formations in football. Gus Malzahn and David Lee made the wildcat fairly well-known around 2006 while they were offensive coordinators at Arkansas.
 |
| Above: The Miami Dolphins brought the Wildcat to the NFL, but they haven't done much with it since. |
The formation exploded in popularity when Lee took a QB coach job with the Miami Dolphins and helped them incorporate the Wildcat. Beginning in the third game of that season, the Dolphins deployed the new aspect of their offense with great success. Since then, the Wildcat has spread across the NFL and the NCAA; nowadays it is expected of a coaching staff to have a Wildcat package to diversify their offensive attacks.
In my opinion, most coaches view the Wildcat as trendy and necessary, but they use it halfheartedly. It is a situational formation for most teams, and many NFL clubs deploy it maybe two plays per game. Thus, I believe that more Wildcat innovation could (and should) be the next major trend in football at all levels. As it stands, the base Wildcat formation looks like this for most college and NFL teams:
The play almost invariably starts with a jet sweep motion from the left wingback, or a zone read involving the left running back. The RB behind the center catches the snap, gives or fakes the jet sweep, and then runs right or left. He might have the option to throw the ball downfield, but rarely does (because he is a running back). I don’t understand why there is such a lack in creativity coming from a formation that is essentially limitless.
Teams also tend to leave their original quarterback split out at wide receiver even if they didn’t start the play with him behind center (followed by a shift). I understand an offensive coordinator would want the element of surprise – quarterback heads out towards the sideline when the huddle breaks – but at that point he becomes a useless player. I would rather sacrifice the slight advantage in making defenders react quickly to the formation change, because I prefer having the advantage of a player who can actually contribute on the play.
I believe that a more “throwback” single wing formation can be utilized in a way that also encompasses the more modern aspects of football. First off, the formation would look like this:
Above is a more traditional single wing formation. It may seem somewhat out of date even to coaches using the Wildcat, but I believe it can have a place in football. First, one of the two “running backs” behind center should be the actual quarterback; he should be able to keep the ball on passing plays so the offense doesn’t ever rely on less-skilled passers.
The quarterback and tailback are split; no one is directly behind the center. This isn't a problem, as any college or NFL center worth his salt would be able to complete a directional snap with just a bit of practice. This split look can create an advantage with an unbalanced line, placing either the quarterback or runningback into a more favorable position behind additional blockers.
This base formation can actually do quite a bit if emphasis is placed on different motions and play fakes in order to get a numerical advantage over the defense. The defense might see this offensive set and shift to account for its absurd stack to the right, but I would suggest creative motioning (wingbacks, fullbacks, even tackles) in order to outnumber the defense for power runs and jet sweeps. The zone read even fits nicely here.
I believe that as a football philosophy, the Wildcat is underutilized and lacking in creativity. Considering that teams have used draft picks on athletic quarterbacks that could be "a wildcat guy," startlingly few of these players are used with any effectiveness when they truly could be effective. Why spend a draft pick on a guy who plays maybe a snap or two, and doesn't even play on special teams units?
A formation such as the one above could be advantageous for offenses, but only if teams buy into using it as a significant aspect of their offense. Part of the problem with Wildcat packages now is that they receive little practice time, and therefore little trust during a game’s crucial moments. I hope and expect that this will change fairly soon.
